Pentest Copilot vs. ZeroPath: Choosing the Right Security Solution for Your Needs

In the ever-evolving cybersecurity landscape, organizations require AI-driven security solutions that go beyond traditional testing methods. Pentest Copilot and ZeroPath are two innovative solutions, but they serve entirely different purposes:

by Kathan Desai

February 24, 2025

Pentest Copilot vs. ZeroPath: Choosing the Right Security Solution for Your Needs

Pentest Copilot focuses on real-world penetration testing, red teaming, and continuous security validation across networks, applications, and cloud environments.
ZeroPath is a Static Application Security Testing (SAST) tool that scans source code for vulnerabilities before deployment, helping developers and DevSecOps teams secure applications early in the software development lifecycle (SDLC).

Choosing between these two depends on who you are (Red Teamer, CISO, Developer, Security Engineer, SOC Analyst, etc.) and what you’re looking to secure. This blog provides a detailed comparison of both platforms, outlining when to use Pentest Copilot or ZeroPath based on your specific security needs.

Core Differences: Pentest Copilot vs. ZeroPath

Feature	Pentest Copilot (Red Teaming & Penetration Testing)	ZeroPath (Static Application Security Testing - SAST)
Primary Users	Red Teams, Security Engineers, SOC Analysts, CISOs	Developers, DevSecOps Teams, Security Engineers
Testing Scope	Entire infrastructure: Applications, Networks, Cloud, Internal & External Security	Application source code security only
Attack Type	Live adversary emulation, real-world attack path simulation	Static code analysis, detecting security flaws before deployment
Pre vs. Post Deployment	Post-deployment, live testing of running applications & infrastructure	Pre-deployment scanning of application codebases
Zero-Day Discovery	Discovers vulnerabilities in live environments	Finds security flaws in source code before deployment
Risk Prioritization	Context-driven, attack chain prioritization	Automated vulnerability detection & patch generation
Automation & AI Usage	AI-driven penetration testing, dynamic attack graphs	LLM-based vulnerability detection, automated patch creation
Compliance Support	Compliance testing (SOC2, ISO, GDPR, etc.)	Helps with secure code development, but not compliance frameworks
Best For	Testing external & internal security risks, real-world attack vectors	Securing application code before deployment

When to Choose Pentest Copilot Over ZeroPath

If you are a CISO, Red Team Lead, Security Engineer, or SOC Analyst, you need real-world security validation, not just code-level analysis. Here’s why Pentest Copilot is the better choice:

1. Simulating Real-World Attacks vs. Code Analysis

ZeroPath focuses on scanning source code for vulnerabilities before it reaches production, detecting issues like business logic flaws, broken authentication, and SQL injections.
Pentest Copilot simulates real-world cyberattacks by performing live penetration testing to validate how attackers might exploit vulnerabilities post-deployment.

Why This Matters:
✅ Hackers don’t just look at code—they exploit weaknesses in live systems.
✅ Pentest Copilot actively tests how vulnerabilities can be chained together, unlike ZeroPath, which only scans code for potential flaws.

2. Continuous Post-Deployment Security Validation

ZeroPath helps developers secure applications before deployment, but it does not monitor ongoing threats once the software is in production.
Pentest Copilot continuously validates security post-deployment, ensuring cloud workloads, APIs, web apps, and internal networks remain secure over time.

Why This Matters:
✅ Cyber threats don’t stop after deployment—Pentest Copilot keeps security teams ahead of evolving threats.
✅ ZeroPath ensures secure code, but it doesn’t test how applications perform under real-world attack conditions.

3. Attack Path Visualization & Risk Prioritization

ZeroPath lists vulnerabilities and suggests fixes for code issues, but it doesn’t show how attackers could chain exploits together.
Pentest Copilot offers real-time attack graphs, dynamically mapping out attack paths and highlighting the most exploitable vulnerabilities in a live system.

Why This Matters:
✅ Not all vulnerabilities need immediate fixes—Pentest Copilot prioritizes the most dangerous ones first.
✅ Attack graphs help security teams visualize real-world attack progression, making remediation faster and more strategic.

4. Red Teaming, Lateral Movement & Cloud Security

Pentest Copilot goes beyond basic penetration testing and simulates Active Directory attacks, lateral movement, phishing campaigns, and cloud infrastructure attacks.
ZeroPath does not provide internal network security testing, red teaming, or cloud misconfiguration analysis.

Why This Matters:
✅ ZeroPath secures code before deployment, but Pentest Copilot protects the entire infrastructure post-deployment.
✅ Organizations using hybrid and multi-cloud environments benefit from Pentest Copilot’s AI-driven cloud security testing.

5. Social Engineering & Phishing Simulations

ZeroPath does not offer phishing simulations, as it focuses solely on code security.
Pentest Copilot provides real-world phishing attack simulations, allowing organizations to test their employees’ resilience to phishing attacks.

Why This Matters:
✅ Pentest Copilot helps organizations train employees against phishing—ZeroPath does not.
✅ Social engineering remains one of the most common attack vectors—organizations need to test human weaknesses, not just code weaknesses.

When to Choose ZeroPath Over Pentest Copilot

If you are a developer or DevSecOps professional, ZeroPath is the better choice for securing applications before deployment.

1. Secure Code Before Production

ZeroPath integrates into CI/CD pipelines, scanning code before deployment to catch security flaws early.
Pentest Copilot focuses on post-deployment security but does not analyze source code.

✅ For DevSecOps teams, ZeroPath helps ensure applications are built securely from day one.

2. Automated Patch Generation

ZeroPath can generate automatic security patches and submit pull requests (PRs) to GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket.
Pentest Copilot prioritizes risk-based remediation but does not generate code fixes.

✅ If you want automated vulnerability patching, ZeroPath is a great choice.

Final Verdict: Who Should Use Which Product?

User Type	Best Choice	Why?
CISOs & Security Engineers	Pentest Copilot	Provides full infrastructure security validation, including network, cloud, and red teaming
Red Teamers & Pen Testers	Pentest Copilot	Focuses on real-world attack simulation and adversary tactics
SOC Analysts	Pentest Copilot	Enables continuous security validation, exposure management, and compliance reporting
DevSecOps Teams	ZeroPath	Helps secure applications before deployment by detecting vulnerabilities in source code
Developers	ZeroPath	Automates vulnerability detection and patch generation in GitHub, GitLab, and CI/CD pipelines

Conclusion: Pentest Copilot & ZeroPath Serve Different Security Needs

While both Pentest Copilot and ZeroPath use AI for security automation, they serve entirely different functions.

If you need application security testing at the source code level (before deployment), choose ZeroPath.
If you need continuous penetration testing, real-world attack simulations, and full infrastructure security validation (post-deployment), choose Pentest Copilot.

For CISOs, red teams, and security engineers, Pentest Copilot is the superior choice.
For developers and DevSecOps teams, ZeroPath is a better fit.